Well, if it is your position that you do not provide your personal views to the committee when asked, only under certain...
I think history shows that those of us who supported the surge were right and people like you who did not think we neede...
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is supposed to provide the best advice he can as far as our overall national security i...
Which has greater risk? Our continued, limited action or significant action such as the establishment of a no-fly zone?
This, again, gives validity to my concern because, obviously, we may not have been inactive, but any observer knows that...
I must tell both the witnesses at the onset I am very concerned about the role you have played over the last 2 years, yo...
The decision on whether to use force is the decision of our elected officials.
I will ask you for the third time. Do you believe that we should take military action?
Do you believe the continued costs and risks of our inaction in Syria are now worse for our national security interests ...
One of the things that is a little frustrating to some of us is we're sort of seeing a repeat of the Iraq scenario, in t...
I think we all know, and I know you agree, that the situation has worsened over time, to the point where the jihadists a...
Both former Secretary of Defense Panetta and General Dempsey... supported supplying weapons to the rebels.
Can Patriot missiles shoot down Scud missiles?
Of course you are aware that the Russians continue their flow of weapons into Bashar Assad's forces; and even now, later...
I think that if we could assure that the weapons were going to the right people and that we would not have to face them ...
So we really aren't putting pilots at risk and there's not a requirement to take out the air defenses around Damascus.
I hope you will follow in their footsteps, and I would remind you again on the issue of Syria.
The United States and our allies could identify and destroy quite a fair amount of Assad's operational aircraft on the g...
