We want them to pay.
If you want to expedite the pace of clean ups, and ultimately reducing costs, in some cases we should give more latitude to local and State ...
I would challenge EPA to show me one site where a viable, potentially responsible party has not been made to pay their share.
If the Obama administration is serious about finding ways to stimulate the economy and create jobs, imposing a new tax on businesses is not ...
The balance in the Superfund Trust does not affect the funds available for current or future annual appropriations.
The Obama administration has exploited the BP spill to pursue a radical agenda to shut down America's domestic production of oil and gas.
Would that not mean that we are actually putting our manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage from those under that particular scenario?
It is a very successful program.
I think that is probably the best of all worlds.
Yes, well, and I agree. And that is what I thought it was.
If we have a tax on chemical companies, regardless of whether or not there is any problem with polluting and all that, and that tax would go...
The polluter is paying now. It is not a matter of the polluter has to pay.
No, I was referring to the bailout. The source of that was the $700 billion bailout.
I have noted before that the Obama administration has exploited the BP spill to pursue its radical agenda to shut down America's domestic pr...
I will yield to no one in terms of trying to get results.
I like to get on record whenever I can, to compliment everyone who is involved in it.
it seems like it is pretty easy to increase taxes nowadays, but perhaps that will just be a temporary one.
Are you aware of the study at Fort Campbell and can you provide comment to the results, to include clarification on false positives?
