the panel assessed that repeal of DADT poses a low risk to military effectiveness.
A retention drop of 23 percent would be significant.
I am not confident that we actually know what the impact on recruiting will be but any decrease will compound our abilit...
It is my opinion that this created a perception that the decision had been made from the President on down.
if it ain't broke, don't fix it. It has worked. I really believe it has worked.
70 percent of military members think that repeal would have a positive, mixed, or no effect on unit effectiveness.
This is not a social thing. This is combat effectiveness. That is what the country pays Marines to do.
As I see it now, the policy approved in 1993 has worked and I do not see a need to change something that is not impactin...
Our military is meant for one thing: to fight and win America's wars, not a social science laboratory.
According to your report, 30 percent of those who turned in a survey said repealing DADT would have a negative impact on...
Now is the wrong time to overturn DADT. As U.S. troops remain in the thick of war in Afghanistan, there is risk involved...
There's just one problem with that. It's not true.
They said earmarks are a gateway drug that needs to be eliminated in order to demonstrate that we are serious about fisc...
It surprises a lot of people when they hear me say it is good to be back with you, but it is.
the Department may have leaked the proposed regulations to parties supporting the Administration's position and investor...
I hope to continue working in a bipartisan fashion to ensure we pass a WRDA next year.
I used to say that while I am ranked as the most conservative, there are some areas where I am a big spender.
It upsets people no end when they find out that the person who is ranked as the most conservative member of the U.S. Sen...
