So now I want to discuss what actually happened with the regional credit for that net new asset amount from Client 5 in ...
And there is also, however, a fear of an indictment, is there not?
Is he one of the people you are going to be speaking to as part of that investigation?
Retroactively. Why did you do that?
And where it is different. It is different in a very critical way at a very critical time for your bank.
It would give a very different impression visually.
Did you find that some Credit Suisse bankers helped refer U.S. customers to intermediaries who advised them to transfer ...
To the extent that Swiss law allows you.
Well, we call them 'books.' But we are going to get into this a little bit more.
OK. Well, that is what happened here.
I do not think you can fairly or honestly say that this is irrelevant, this representation to the public.
This kind of language, this kind of an approach to the process is not consistent, it is not acceptable.
Out of how many?
But they are not covered. We do not know for sure, do we, that those 14.
So the people who approved the travel were not rogue, but the people who did travel were rogue.
With the effect that it had, which was to make the Swiss operation look more positive than it otherwise would.
The question is showing Switzerland in the positive or in the negative. That is the issue.
These banks operate in the United States. They come here, they get clients here. OK? They have to operate according to o...