I do not understand how that connects, then, with the rules on discrimination. It sounds a lot like discrimination.
So this is some really sensitive information, and it is supposed to be voluntary to hand it over.
Well, we have been tested on that numerous times and were never accused of discrimination during the 10-year life of the...
Telling people it will cost you $1,500 if you do not reveal very sensitive medical information, I think, stretches the b...
I have to say when you charge differentially, $1,500 or sometimes more, and that can happen because people do not want t...
The consumer should decide when to release that credit record information to others.
The credit reporting agency is a threat to each of us personally, but it is also a threat to our national security.
consumers should be able to control their own data, and without consumer control, credit reporting companies really have...
I have introduced the FREE Act with Senator Schatz and more than a dozen other Senators.
If companies like Equifax do not pay us to sell our information to other people, then we should not have to pay them to ...
opening statement
The law says five, 5 years of exclusivity, but drug companies game the system.
If the restrictions that prevent purchasers from importing the exact same drugs at lower prices from places like Canada ...
So you would be in favor of drug importation from any place that's not doing what you call price control?
But drug competition from Canada, price negotiation, are market solutions. They're not government mandates.
Your industry isn't based on competitive markets. It's based on totally artificial taxpayer granted monopolies.
The high cost of prescription drugs is a huge problem. Let's talk about the best way to tackle this public health crisis...
Another market solution is negotiation. If the Federal Government were allowed to negotiate more competitive drug prices...
