After restructuring, no.
Yes or no, Mr. Secretary? Does the taxpayer have first dibs...
People need to be held accountable. Because political decisions were being made in your department.
A number is all I ask for right now.
I would hope, if any did come before you, you would absolutely not subordinate the taxpayer.
Are you going to do the due diligence to go and find out who did that and hold them accountable?
Does the taxpayer have first dibs on the $535 million----
There has to be transparency in what is going on here.
I am asking for the Justice Department to get involved.
Mr. Chairman, I have some questions that haven't been asked.
I disagree with the comment you made earlier, that a lot of these are redundant questions that are being asked.
I more share the concerns of another part of the Obama administration, in Treasury, where they said the Justice Departme...
They are just concerned about the timing, the politics. 'Wait until after the election.' This is disgusting.
You cannot subrogate the taxpayer, meaning you can't put the taxpayer in the back of the line.
Hydrofracking has been around for 60 years. The EPA took a look at it in 2005, found absolutely no problems with it.
The point being that the aquifer, the water supply itself, is way up at the surface of the earth and all the activity wh...
Just to give you an idea of the impact that has had on us, we have had an increase of close to 58,000 jobs just in 2009 ...
Sir, you don't even know how many layers of casing go around a typical drill, so if the very top level doesn't know the ...
