If we did that, we wouldn't need a national energy tax. We wouldn't need to raise the price of gasoline.
Why would we encourage, why would we have a subsidy, why should 75 percent of the renewable energy subsidies go to wind ...
My view is that if we built 100 nuclear plants, if we electrify half the cars and trucks, and if we had mini-Manhattan P...
Senator Cardin mentioned that, he has been a consistent supporter of nuclear power.
It deliberately raises the price of energy when our goal for ourselves and for the world... ought to be cheap energy.
I agree with him that climate change is real, that humans are causing it. My problem is with the solution.
I have suggested a different way for the next 20 years, which I believe is simpler and will work.
The cost to the rate payer for nuclear, according to the National Academy, is 6 cents to 13 cents over the lifetime per ...
I think nuclear is going to be part of the mix.
The subsidies for wind are about 10 times that for nuclear.
They warned that over the next 20 years new energy production, especially biofuels, will consume a land mass larger than...
If we make 20 percent of our electricity from wind turbines, that would be 1.4 million birds per year.
I accept the National Academy's conclusions that climate change is real and that humans have probably caused most of it ...
I would do that if you would join me in repealing in the $170 billion subsidy for wind power.
I would like us to have a carbon-free electricity standard.
The recommendations of the Nature Conservancy paper, I hope, are something this committee would take seriously.
To equal the production of one nuclear reactor, you would have to continuously forest an area the size of the Great Smok...
I think the fine was fine. I think they should be fined for killing 85 birds.
