I think our country's best interest is the same, which is to continue to have coal as a low cost big supplier of electri...
Thanks, Tom. These are very helpful conversations.
We did a little computation of--we asked the Energy Information Administration--wind power gets 25 times as much Governm...
I appreciate the comment, Mr. Chairman. Just my own thought, I am not in favor of trading mercury, but some averaging mi...
If these were easy issues to resolve, we would have solved them a long time ago.
Air pollution knows no State boundaries.
Our legislation provides an aggressive--but we think achievable--schedule for fossil fuel power plants to reduce harmful...
We need legislative certainty to protect public health because too many lives are at stake.
The preliminary costs suggest, based upon EPA, well, the EPA analysis so far, shows that rates will rise between about 1...
Those are significant reductions that the EPA agrees will save more than 215,000 lives over a 15-year period.
But to reach 90, then, you would have to buy some other technology like Mr. Durham's technology and add it to the SCR an...
There is no excuse remaining for not moving ahead to do what we know how to do with SOx, NOx and mercury.
Well, my major request to you, and I said this to the Administrator yesterday, is that you put a very high priority on d...
The administration's proposal to cut State regulatory grants... is completely unrealistic.
I have never suspected--I am not a scientist--that you could capture and sequester enough carbon from coal plants to mak...
I want to make sure we know what we are doing.
And the purpose of our legislation is to fix that problem.
I think you should do, and whether it should be hazardous waste, which I think it should not be.
