I'm concerned, as others are, that President Karzai is not serious about working to address the warlordism that has alie...
It's too early to judge the long-term effects of the offensive in Marjah but already there are reports that the Taliban ...
I question how well we can 'clear' areas when Taliban fighters meld into local populous and 'hold' them in a sustainable...
The treaty would reduce the size of our nuclear arsenal without constraining our ability to defend our Nation, while fos...
There has been a lot of discussion about the ways in which ratifying this treaty will enhance our national security.
Its ratification would also offer proof to the international community of the commitment of the United States to fulfill...
Should we be concerned about the kind of message we'd send to other nations, for example Iran, about the United States-R...
A single weapon would have a devastating impact.
At the same time, we must ensure that the treaty is verifiable and does not compromise our ability to monitor nuclear we...
To me this underscores what I have long believed, that to best secure our Nation we must move beyond a cold-war mindset ...
This treaty stands to reduce the size of our arsenal and the Russian arsenal, making the world a safer place without con...
I'm concerned that calls for maintaining a large arsenal are based on a misunderstanding of the potential impact of any ...
The reason we have to maintain this large inventory is because we no longer have the ability to produce nuclear weapons ...
Thanks so much, Mr. Chairman.
To adequately deal with North Korea's and Iran's nuclear aspirations, we need full cooperation of other nations, particu...
It's my understanding that nothing in this treaty prohibits us from building new warheads, if needed.
Some of my colleagues on this committee who oppose this treaty do not seem to have taken this call for action to heart.
I would like to use this hearing to get some clarity on what is really needed for us to maintain a credible deterrent.
