How can the Fed adopt a rule that ignores specific statutory language?
It seems to me the rule the Fed is in the process of adopting ignores that specific metric.
You are telling us you don't even know what happened.
But you said you are still willing to use it, didn't you?
I would hope that you would go back and look at the history.
How can you not have that? You are in charge of the program.
I don't understand how you can sit here and tell us you are serious about reforming this loan program.
We have got Members on both the Republican and the Democrat side that have read this.
There is $16.1 billion of taxpayer money at risk.
As Chief Justice John Marshall once said, the power to tax involves the power to destroy.
I think it is important for us to go back, you know, because we take for granted that technology--you know, I can look o...
Chairman Johnson Announces the Fourth in a Hearing Series on Securing the Future of the Social Security Disability Insur...
Those sidelined from working because of a disability must be able to count on a fair and timely hearing by a Social Secu...
As is customary, for each round of questions, I will limit my time to 5 minutes and ask my colleagues to also limit thei...
Again, I want to thank you all for being here today and for your testimony.
Yeah. I don't think it is mandatory at all under congressional edict.
Thank you, sir. Appreciate your testimony. And since this may be your last meeting with us, we thank you for your servic...
Social Security is a vital part of this Nation, so we need to protect it.
