Do all of you agree that corporations and citizens should not be able to funnel dark money through churches in order to ...
Well, we seem to have differences to the facts, because some people seem to think that the First Amendment is working gr...
You think it's constitutional to ban that.
I think fundamentally that less government is better.
This is not about being able--George Soros being able to channel millions of dollars from a not-for-profit through churc...
I think Rabbi Saperstein's with me on this.
But it's up to them. We agree under the First Amendment, they define their religion any way they want.
Since then, churches and other c(3)'s have had to decide whether or not to directly violate the law and risk potentially...
We must never forget those great words: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibitin...
The First Amendment is the First Amendment for a reason.
Your legacy is very strong here in the importance of development assistance to our national security budget.
we very much depend upon our partnerships with the private sector.
I agree with your assessment that we can always do things better.
Our government has a strong obligation to help stabilize countries under democratic principles and respect for human rig...
It does create a challenge and that is to get political support because if you have commodities that you are using...
The missions are important in these countries.
Today I think U.S. development assistance, foreign assistance enjoys much more political support than it did a couple de...
I applaud the work that our chairman has done and Senator Coons has done in modernizing our food aid.
