I still have a very difficult time understanding a proposal that would somehow possibly decrease our presence in Alaska.
the relocation of the 18th Aggressor Squadron to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) should not be interpreted as the...
Would moving the F-16s from Eielson AFB to JBER require either an environmental analysis or an environmental impact stat...
I would certainly concur with that. And again, I would repeat my request, that you consider sending a general officer as...
It is something I think--it is important for those of us that are looking at this from different agencies to understand ...
I think we have got to pursue this weatherization more aggressively.
I'm still hearing from folks that they feel that the agency is still understaffed, and that is causing what they conside...
What I'm trying to understand is whether or not our oil production, offshore and onshore, is up or down?
I understand that. And I will, in probably my next round here, ask about some of those incentives or disincentives that ...
As Americans face steeply rising energy costs, it's important that this subcommittee ensure that the agencies that sit b...
But this is where the confusion is because the statistics are being used to suggest that there is this incredible increa...
You do agree that it is's an important part of what this was all about?
Will that information be shared publicly, or will there be provisions that will allow for protecting any trade secrets t...
the congressional intent was that part of these new fees be used to expand the capacity so that we could expedite the or...
What is a reasonable prospect of repayment? Is it an 80 percent chance that it is going to be repaid, a 70 percent? Is i...
Let me ask you one more then, and this is a requirement to 'provide an amount sufficient to carry out the project.'
This is not tweaking a program, but some serious changes to this program so that we do have assurances to the taxpayers.
Do you think that in that situation this particular condition of the authorizing statute was vague in any way?
