the areas that he could help us to increase production, it is actually going the opposite way because of his policies.
It seems to me the rule the Fed is in the process of adopting ignores that specific metric.
How can the Fed adopt a rule that ignores specific statutory language?
It is underway 4 years later.
How can you not have that? You are in charge of the program.
We have got Members on both the Republican and the Democrat side that have read this.
I don't understand how you can sit here and tell us you are serious about reforming this loan program.
There is $16.1 billion of taxpayer money at risk.
You are telling us you don't even know what happened.
But you said you are still willing to use it, didn't you?
I would hope that you would go back and look at the history.
As Chief Justice John Marshall once said, the power to tax involves the power to destroy.
As is customary, for each round of questions, I will limit my time to 5 minutes and ask my colleagues to also limit their questioning to 5 m...
Social Security is a vital part of this Nation, so we need to protect it.
Thank you, sir. Appreciate your testimony. And since this may be your last meeting with us, we thank you for your service to Social Security...
Yeah. I don't think it is mandatory at all under congressional edict.
Modernizing this decades-old regulatory framework should instead focus on providing relief to all stakeholders by repealing the intertwined ...
Since Congress created the problem decades ago, it has a responsibility to review and fix them today.
