Yes. I mean, well, there is nothing inherently--I mean, the problem is, as long as you have electricity and water, your spent-fuel pool shou...
I am pro research, including offshore--the offshore wind.
During that time, you have no reason to think that they are in a dangerous condition when stored under NRC regulations on site.
I suggested that we apply the same rigor and ambitious goals to energy research that we did to the Manhattan Project.
Since nuclear power produces 70 percent of our carbon-free electricity, and renewable--and other renewables produce a few percent, why shoul...
It looks like it could be an opportunity for the United States, given our experience with small reactors with the Navy.
We could find money to take a fairly modest energy research budget of $6 billion and make it $7, $8, $9, or $10 billion.
the amount of money to do the research is relatively modest.
we have a Government that is collecting $2.2 trillion and spending $3.7 trillion, we have a lot of tough decisions to make.
the President agreed with that in connection with the vote of the new START Treaty, which I supported. I think it was a wise treaty.
most of NNSA's responsibility are in support of the U.S. military, and this appropriation ought to be treated in part like Defense spending.
The answer is, yes, it is safe to use.
I want to focus on some of the things that Senator Feinstein talked about.
I deal with long term. Short-term, I support jump starting electric cars.
Thank you for the meeting and underscore the importance of that.
I think we ought to talk about big wind.
What should it be? If you were Professor Chu and were not bound by the office of budget, I mean, what should--well, let me put it another wa...
It seems to me that to continue to subsidize over a long term a mature technology is not appropriate.
