The things I can control or the things that the United States can control are its emissions.
It also might trigger some of the tax incentives that are built in now for home energy efficiencies, which would be sort of a double benefit...
With Section 702 set to sunset at the end of this year it is vital that we have these discussions before we take our next steps.
We are happy to pay for--provide additional resources--
Congress certainly has the authority to do that and I think that's one of the key issues for this Committee and the Congress to consider.
And to quote you the cause of climate change is rising energy consumption using fossil fuels; correct?
So your conclusion would be that it really saves taxpayers' monies and efficient use of taxpayer' dollars.
Our civil liberties are not currency. They are not a price we pay for national security.
I am told the cost of, well, this year's funding is $4 million, which seems to be a reasonable investment in such efficiency.
Would increasing loan limits help low- and moderate-income homeowners pay for very needed repairs and renovations?
They have completely lost their grip on reality, and are so subservient to fossil fuel overlords that they're willing to eliminate hundreds ...
The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness is the only Federal agency that is exclusively devoted to alleviating homelessness.
I think it's a very unfortunate episode in the Supreme Court's history.
You claim that renewable energy is always expensive.
It looked like the rights of women were being deliberately removed from the equation by the Justices of the Supreme Court.
Roe v. Wade is an important precedent of the Supreme Court. It was decided in 1973.
I find that somewhat disturbing. It seems to be entirely disruptive of not only the local housing market but the real estate market.
