My sense--and I'll ask you for your sense, General--is that if this treaty is not ratified, the prospects of serious fol...
Your judgment from your perspective is that relationship of the treaty would enhance stability and transparency into the...
The other aspect here, too, is that some of our concerns are actually protecting our installations and our systems from ...
Let me pose a question again to both of you that arises consistently, and that is if the failure to ratify this New STAR...
If the Russians were, today, able to deploy an effective defense of Russia, our warhead requirements to maintain a deter...
We both have the interest in, on one hand, allowing people to inspect and verify the relevant data, the critical data on...
Another way to look at this, if we deploy a very effective missile defense, the Russians might decide to use bomber forc...
I think that the Russians intend, at this point, to comply with the New START treaty.
If the Russians were to deploy missile defense, it would depend on the capabilities of those systems.
Why would the Russians enter into the New START treaty with a verification regime, since none exists today, if their int...
You would be back into the nuclear arms race of the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s.
Isn't that the definition of nuclear instability?
That's why President Reagan said 'trust but verify.' We will be verifying.
That would require new bombers with nuclear capabilities, correct?
We here are looking very carefully at our nuclear enterprise, the laboratories and everything else.
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
I hope Congress takes the actions that the administration has suggested.
So this is not some current trendy, chic thing that the President's talking about.
