
No one is arguing on safety issues, but we are arguing on process to be able to make sure that we can get that.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
18,700+·quotes on file

No one is arguing on safety issues, but we are arguing on process to be able to make sure that we can get that.

The cumulative effect for them has the same thing. So, this is not just an issue of a law that has been passed.

Americans are saying, I am getting guidance things that I do not know what to do with.

Agencies have only as much rulemaking power as we grant them, so it is incumbent on us to use our legislative power judiciously.

OK. Same thing. Do you think that is agency guidance on that one?

could there be a court challenge to them creating their own regulatory process

Let me just bring up a couple thoughts on that.

Do you believe that is agency guidance for that?

the real issue is here there seems to be a change in the reg on it

So, I think that is a fair question to ask when they, again, find out one day that there is suddenly a very expensive rule that is going to cost them and their consumers a tremendous amount of money for something they wish they would have…

Again, I want to reemphasize that a lot of the issues we are going to talk about today are not about the rules themselves. They are about the process of it.

the assumption is made, of course, everyone is keeping up to date with our guidance

This does not feel like it went through APA if you are those affected.

there is an expectation, as you mentioned before, there are very few significant guidance documents

Do you believe that is also agency guidance?

We are absolutely taking seriously some of the recommendations from GAO.

Thank you, all of you, and I am going to do a quick set of questions here and we will go through at a pretty rapid pace on this and then start moving around.