I think you have made it clear that those are decoupled. I think that is a big step forward from the current law.
I consider them important partners. No partner should just get anything, everything they want.
I think they are wrong in almost all instances.
Certainly not anybody's goal who has been involved in this bill to have EPA spinning its wheels in initial assessments f...
The present version of Lautenberg-Vitter specifically talks about vulnerability of any sub-populations.
I don't think that stalemate benefits the public, but I know it benefits them in many instances.
Would the Lautenberg-Vitter bill improve EPA's ability to get what it needs in that regard?
Do you think California's environmental health and safety protections would be made stronger or weaker by the Lautenberg...
Fine. OK, Dr. Borak, can you comment on a particular statement in the Society of Toxicology letter?
I think it is a very safe presumption in that case that they wouldn't examine that issue, and fail to take action with a...
So following up on that specifically with regard to that California Safer Consumer Products law, do you think Lautenberg...
I think doing that, using Lautenberg-Vitter as a base, resolving those issues, clarifying everything we can, it won't ge...
I am going to support him wholeheartedly. I am going to talk with every Member of this Committee on both sides of the ai...
I have hardly worked with a finer individual in any Department of the Federal Government.
I am sure it comes as no surprise to him when I say the next Deputy Secretary will have some big shoes to fill.
To me, that says it all. And we need people in our government that are willing to serve people directly, that understand...
Again, thank you, Mr. Secretary, for being here.
I would urge you to go look at that and maybe supplement your answer because if what you say is true, and I hope it is, ...
