In plain English, right?
Thank you.
I must say candidly that I was shocked when I realized how this legislation will actually work.
Financial institutions, as I understand the proposal, will no longer be primarily concerned with discerning and meeting ...
The greater dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.
Every single law you have ever passed, every regulation on the books is trumped by this.
We have tried to let the market work, let the consumer, an informed consumer, make decisions, not a bureaucrat make the ...
We do learn from those mistakes, and sometimes those mistakes are quite costly.
Absolutely, it can.
I hope you don't go too far here, or we don't.
The Administration's proposal for a Consumer Financial Protection Agency... results in the Government... deciding which ...
I believe this Committee should examine what caused this financial crisis, develop solutions to the problems identified ...
Individuals consistently make choices that they themselves agree diminish their own well-being in significant ways.
Shouldn't the language require that the real benefits must outweigh real costs to consumers and covered persons instead ...
Why did you choose such a politically biased construct at this point knowing that would raise red flags for some?
Well-regulated and transparent financial markets have been and must continue to be one of the central goals of our finan...
Is your premise basically trying to take risk out of a marketplace? And if there is no risk, there is no marketplace, is...
This is a real departure from, as you said in your paper, from the model that we have relied on for a long time.
