You're going to see insurance markets that are going to start to be really unstable because you're not providing any federal support for the...
The objective then, as with the bill before this committee, was to entrust sufficient resources and decisions into hands closer to the peopl...
To his great credit, he accepted that this broken program was in need of a major overhaul.
So the notion that somehow we have, in the corner of Graham-Cassidy, figured this out, I just do not believe it.
Thank God we have Medicaid expansion. It is having the biggest impact on that problem.
Medicaid was then less than 6 percent of the Federal budget; now it is 10 percent.
Medicaid's growth rate is not on a sustainable path.
We express strong support for a per-capita cap structure.
This extreme shift in funding will result in a fiscal crisis beyond what Pennsylvania has experienced to date.
the guarantee of Medicaid... families with high incomes, good health care, but who still need Medicaid...
The impact of these cuts will be devastating to Pennsylvanians.
What has driven people out of poverty in America is not the way we structured TANF, it is the EITC, it is the SNAP program.
We all benefit when people gain health-care coverage. And I think we are all diminished and in fact potentially injured when they do not.
the consequences of this major change in financing falls solely on those enrolled in the traditional Medicaid program...
The Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson bill and previous Republican bills are not the first attempt to restructure Medicaid.
I totally disagree. In fact, I think this chart raises the question on health care in rural America.
I think the process here--I think even folks who are supportive of this Republican bill would say that the process is not in any way commens...
this bill would cut those resources and impose an arbitrary cap.
