I think doing that, using Lautenberg-Vitter as a base, resolving those issues, clarifying everything we can, it won't ge...
So following up on that specifically with regard to that California Safer Consumer Products law, do you think Lautenberg...
I hope we don't, none of us, cling to a bill that may be perfect in any of our individual minds that will not pass.
Fine. OK, Dr. Borak, can you comment on a particular statement in the Society of Toxicology letter?
Do you think California's environmental health and safety protections would be made stronger or weaker by the Lautenberg...
Would the Lautenberg-Vitter bill improve EPA's ability to get what it needs in that regard?
I don't think that stalemate benefits the public, but I know it benefits them in many instances.
The present version of Lautenberg-Vitter specifically talks about vulnerability of any sub-populations.
Certainly not anybody's goal who has been involved in this bill to have EPA spinning its wheels in initial assessments f...
I think they are wrong in almost all instances.
I consider them important partners. No partner should just get anything, everything they want.
I think you have made it clear that those are decoupled. I think that is a big step forward from the current law.
I found this hearing very, very useful, and it continues a lot of conversations with all interested stakeholders.
I think this bill fixes that.
I think it is a perfect example of one of the misimpressions I was talking about in my opening statement.
I think this is a great example of one of those clarifications.
We are working on proposed revisions to the bill to address all of these concerns.
We thought that was clear in our language, but Senator Udall and I are going to make it crystal clear in our manager's a...
