If you look at the stock prices of insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and for-profit hospitals since Obamacare passed, they have done extremely well.

Reductions in provider payment rates could limit access to specialists and make it more difficult to support integrated delivery systems.

My patients had terrible disease, multiple chronic conditions but could not receive care elsewhere.

It ends Medicaid expansion which has enabled more than 400,000 moderate to low income Coloradans pay for health insurance.

Delivery system reform efforts would be challenging in a per-capita cap or block grant environment.

First, let me say one thing about the $1 trillion cut to Medicaid. It is repurposed into the flexible block grant.

Yes, you can spend, you can also supplement, if you will, the traditional Medicaid budget with the extra dollars that Kansas is receiving, and you have the flexibility to do that as well.

Those opposing this amendment clearly don't care about Americans in these and similar States.

It is essential to bring health-care decisions down to the State and local levels.

Absolutely. Senator Heller, folks say you are losing the Medicaid expansion dollars. No, you still get them; you just get them in a flexible block grant.

There is a $2-billion implementation fund included in the bill.

This plan gives States the flexibility to innovate and create health-care systems.

This gives your State the flexibility to do premium support.

We need to pass the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson amendment, returning power to patients and States while expanding access to coverage for millions.

There is a Merriam-Webster definition of affordable; it means you can afford, as opposed to the $39,000 premiums in the ACA for those in the individual market.

Sign me up.

But it is the answer.

Under our bill, he could be automatically enrolled so that he would automatically be insured.