Chicago-style backroom buy-offs, at the expense of the American taxpayers.
Chicago-style, back room buyouts at the expense of the American taxpayers.
I think short selling may be valuable. I don't think that negative short selling that's abusive is valuable. I think it'...
I'm very concerned about this abusive short selling approach.
Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for your energetic leadership in this area. I want to thank the three of you for the w...
Regulation SHO--do you think Regulation SHO has really worked that well?
Look, I don't think it's the right thing to allow people to negatively short sell, especially when they do it to a compa...
I hope you really--and Lanny, I hope you guys in the Justice Department will really look at this too, because I know too...
I believe that number is probably closer to 50 than it is the 195 that has been bandied about.
I would not exactly characterize these prosecutions as 'successes.'
I personally believe China may very well show up at Copenhagen and say, well, we are for all of this, but it is not goin...
We need to get smartened up and realize it's here, and begin to deal with it in a comprehensive fashion.
These situations demand far more creative thinking than we've been able to provide.
We exempt, of course, a lot of small businesses, because obviously--and I agree with Senator Enzi in that point.
The statistic in my own opening statement, that still sort of stunned me when I kept on reading it over and over again--...
Well, I am very interested in how a cap-and-trade program would affect the poor.
Should we not say 'shift,' if it appears that the coal, oil, and gas States would lose a significant amount of jobs?
Is it possible to construct a cap-and-trade program that reduces carbon emissions, that is not felt by the poor?
