that's why the Citizens United case, I think, is a correct decision.
it would be a disaster
Do you really believe that the Constitution allows the Federal Government this much power to pick and choose who may say...
In Citizens United, the Court listed at least 25 precedents dating back almost 75 years.
When President Obama announced your nomination he said that you believed that 'in a democracy powerful interests must no...
In short, the First Amendment does not belong to any definable category or persons or entities. It belongs to all who ex...
These are small companies that want the legal protections that incorporating provides.
the application of that statute to any kinds of classic electioneering materials was in fact constitutional.
Many folks have attacked the decision, saying it is a prime example of, quote, 'conservative judicial activism,' unquote...
All right. Well, there was no foreign corporation involved. That is one of the points I am trying to establish.
But by overruling that one precedent, was not the Court really reaffirming a much larger group of previous decisions?
tell that to Blanch Lincoln how incumbents are protected.
I urge you to maintain that focus for the remainder of the hearings and refrain from further hyperbole questioning of Ms...
Some of my colleagues and my friends on the other side are really taken aback by some of the arguments on Citizens Unite...
I think those efforts fall short of even the most basic factual scrutiny.
Well, I'll tell you, this bothers me a lot, because I know that there were plenty of doctors in ACOG who did not believe...
what the Congress had found was that these corporations and unions had a kind of access to Congressmen, had a kind of in...
the only thing that was at issue was essentially the sponsoring organizations, whether it was the Office of Career Servi...
