I think you are exactly the kind of folks we ought to be talking to in depth, in detail.
we need to deter Vladimir Putin, and we need to do that in a very forthright and resolved way.
I agree it is basically one-sided, so let me go to you, Secretary Nuland.
no decision or recommendation should be permitted or advanced that would in any way limit its applicability to any Europ...
Part of the problem is when we heard this actually from the Prime Minister himself, they are very reluctant to ask for s...
I think from an LNG export policy standpoint... the United States should reexamine our existing policy and laws on energ...
we will not ever accept the grab by Russia--what it is doing in the Ukraine or any other country.
I'm wondering if Wisconsin's success and experience during this really extreme weather can serve as lessons for other re...
Thank you for convening this incredibly important hearing.
So we are standing by the assurance that we basically granted by being a signatory to the Budapest memorandum to do ever...
Part of the rationale was we certainly did not want to do anything that could provoke Vladimir Putin.
I think it is also unfortunate that when you take a look at our current budget situation, the enormous pressure we are u...
It is the policy of the United States to preserve and advance the successful multi-stakeholder model that governs the In...
Are we rethinking whether or not we are going to provide them the type of support they actually requested and they actua...
your concern about the proposal to 'Finlandize' Ukraine is warranted.
Simply put, if NATO did not exist, we would have to invent it.
They should be given equipment that would help mitigate Russia's strengths in armor and aircraft.
That is not significant. That is not a demonstration of resolve. That communicates hesitancy to the Russians.
