This isn't just a problem for the 7 percent or the 450 counties, it is not just coastal issue, it is an interior issue, ...
We also removed the property sales trigger, which had frozen real estate markets and threatened to rob many middle-class...
I believe it is imperative that Congress remain active and engaged to ensure this agency and its partners have the resou...
This is a national issue of the highest priority.
I find it puzzling, after working so hard to pass a law that specifically caps rate increases and encourages FEMA to str...
Are those mistakes elsewhere in State plans?
It is our constitutional responsibility to identify and allocate how our constituent's hard earned tax dollars will be s...
I just want to note that factored into the EPA's Louisiana plan are just facts that aren't there, capacity that isn't th...
This is a nonsensical Federal policy and it is contrary to the intent of the 1997 Protocols to the Migratory Bird Treati...
I look forward to hearing from Administrator McCarthy on EPA's proposed existing source rule.
Again, government does not get a lot right, but this is one I think government has historically.
Madam Administrator, it appears in the proposal's accompanying regulatory impact analysis that climate benefits are calc...
EPA's proposed rule will increase costs to families, schools, hospitals and businesses and in doing so, as always, it wi...
It is really a truly unprecedented, outside the fence set of regulations that will have major negative impacts on our Na...
Without fish, you do not have fishermen. Without fishermen, you do not have an economy in a lot of these communities.
What I am hearing is you factored in overall national economic growth. That is not what I am talking about.
This is a nonsensical Federal policy and is contrary to the intent of the 1997 protocols to the Migratory Bird Treaties.
I do not understand is why any Member of this legislative body would oppose this bill.
