They want to know that the next nominee to our Supreme Court will be faithful to that Constitution even if they don't like it.
I believe an activist--and I think I am quoting Senator Hatch, although he would not give me credit for it--he would not take credit for it.
We are doing our best to be cooperative.
It is certainly not going to help, sir.
She was a leader, she was a driving force in the effort to remove the military from full and equal access.
I do believe that your actions, I think your actions there were not consistent with the law.
But fundamentally I think it is not activism to reverse a bad decision, and the Court should do that.
The oath is that you would impartially do your duty with equal right to the poor and the rich.
Your service to the country and to protect the Constitution is not valued by these institutions.
I thank our military witnesses for, with clarity, stating the true facts of what happened at Harvard.
I think they just simply returned to the plain words of the document, and there was evidence that the people who drafted it had that in mind...
I guess I am in favor of good ideas coming from wherever you can get them.
This is a very, very significant matter.
Congress frankly was very frustrated at the law schools. We passed four or five versions of the Solomon amendment to get around every maneuv...
I would have to classify you as someone in the theme of the legal progressive.
I think we do have this national discussion going on about a revival of progressivism.
It is not a coronation, as I have said, but a confirmation process.
Ms. Kagan has less real legal experience of any nominee in at least 50 years.