Sequestration's cost us a lot.
Do you think it's in our national security interest to counter the Iranian aggression throughout the Mid-East?
If, after saying that, he doesn't pay a big price, America will pay a big price.
The only thing worse than war is losing a war.
To the American people, you may be tired of fighting these people, but they're not tired of fighting you.
Is it still our policy that Assad must go?
If the Iraqis were to ask us to stay, it would be my opinion that that would be a good decision for us.
Thank you for your clarity and your honesty.
Right. But when it comes to ISIS, the goal is to make sure they are ultimately destroyed.
Is Libya a failed state, fragile state, state on the mend?
Do we have a strategy to prevent that?
A bigger Navy means that you'll have more ships in more places, which will hopefully make some of our adversaries think ...
What does it mean if Iran and Russia and Assad have won in Syria?
What does it mean for Jordan?
I think we have to do two things at once: talk to the Russians about where we are headed but rebuild a nuclear deterrent...
It's in our national security interest to make sure we don't do this twice.
Enough is enough when it comes to Assad. You're a war criminal, by any definition, and a big price.
If they do not go back to their countries, do you think we have a credible plan to detain them inside of Syria long term...
