Even without sequestration, we're proposing significant reductions, are we not?
What risks are we taking on by doing that?
Below 450,000, we don't think we'd be able to do it.
It's going to be very tough.
We couldn't do that at 420,000.
We can ask them, but the damage we would do to them would be irresponsible.
It's important, but unless I'm missing something, we're doing this pretty quickly.
I think it's a really important step forward for victims.
I think we need to understand, though, that it's not going to be the same for our guys on the ground.
This is something that I think is a very important step forward to make sure that victims have advocacy for them and wit...
I had a Special Forces guy come up to me, saying that the night before, the A-10s really saved their butts.
from a perspective of naval readiness, how important are the public shipyards and the Federal employees who work at thes...
General Paxton, are the prepositioned stocks in Norway fully stocked with the equipment needed to support or respond to ...
General Paxton, do you believe these prepositioned stocks adequately mitigate the risk associated with deactivating MPS-...
what is the condition of Army prepositioned stocks (APS)?
Yes, Air Force preferred munitions inventories are short of inventory objectives.
The administration is proposing a significant cut to MILCON and facilities, sustainment, restoration, and modernization ...
I expressed concern about the Marine Corps' decision to deactivate one of three Maritime Prepositioning Squadrons (MPS),...
