General Paxton, do you believe these prepositioned stocks adequately mitigate the risk associated with deactivating MPS-...
General Paxton, are the prepositioned stocks in Norway fully stocked with the equipment needed to support or respond to ...
from a perspective of naval readiness, how important are the public shipyards and the Federal employees who work at thes...
I had a Special Forces guy come up to me, saying that the night before, the A-10s really saved their butts.
This is something that I think is a very important step forward to make sure that victims have advocacy for them and wit...
I think we need to understand, though, that it's not going to be the same for our guys on the ground.
I think it's a really important step forward for victims.
It's important, but unless I'm missing something, we're doing this pretty quickly.
We can ask them, but the damage we would do to them would be irresponsible.
We couldn't do that at 420,000.
It's going to be very tough.
Below 450,000, we don't think we'd be able to do it.
What risks are we taking on by doing that?
Even without sequestration, we're proposing significant reductions, are we not?
Any objective analysis of the global security environment demonstrates that the world is becoming more--not less--danger...
When Congress fails to provide proper training and equipment, we risk being confronted with two unacceptable options: de...
I also want to pass along my condolences to those who have suffered at the Naval Station at Norfolk.
Isn't investing in our acquisition workforce likely to pay for itself many times over in lower acquisition costs?