What we see in the proposed 2018 budget is slashing National Science Foundation spending by 11 percent.
The public interest, public health and national security are going to depend on advancements in science.
Connecticut has a long and historic involvement in shellfish and aquaculture and generally the commitment to the environ...
I've worked with a number of my colleagues on this issue, including Senator Wicker, from Mississippi.
China is now the second largest investor in R&D, a key driver of global competitiveness.
The advancement of science has depended on a healthy investment in research by the Federal Government.
Let me ask you about the budget that we've received from the administration, which cuts back on a number of programs tha...
These cuts specifically target your foundation.
If you set rigorous completion rates, and you don't reach them, you should not be funded anymore.
If we simplify the regulation of colleges and got rid of some of the weeds but made sure that they were paying attention...
recently called for new best practices around the training and use of our Nation's emergency alert system.
There are clear intersections with civil rights, and I hope that, maybe as you previewed in your answer to Senator Hassa...
I think it is ridiculous that colleges don't have the ability to build more innovative models.
I do believe in rigorous regulation. I think that there should be regulation holding colleges to outcomes that they set.
Innovation stinks without accountability.
I do worry about the Congress or regulator directing what innovation is allowed to happen and what isn't.
Nobody is for overregulation or overinvolvement by government, but sometimes standards are necessary.
I expect I will vote for a bill.
