we all must be held accountable to the same extent by the rule of law.
I am here to emphatically say that that is not the case.
I should not have to say this, but obviously that is against the law. It is against Federal law.
What message does the President's refusal to fire Ms. Conway send to the over 2 million people in our Federal work force...
Persistent, notorious, and deliberate Hatch Act violations.
If you have a work force where everybody is campaigning on taxpayer money, that is not a good use of the taxpayer money.
This is about right and wrong. This is about the core principle of our precious democracy that nobody, not one person, n...
the purpose of the Hatch Act as being a separation of the nonpartisan governance of the country from partisan political ...
I see this through two lenses. One is absolutely that the Hatch Act is there to protect Federal employees.
the President, obviously, decided to do what he does, and that's consistent with the statute.
This report explains how Ms. Conway violated the law dozens of times by using her official position to criticize Democra...
OSC's guidance is wrong. There is no limit that criticizing a policy of a sitting President or any other politician is a...
It would be malpractice if we didn't do it.
Most people want to believe, however, that once the President is in office, he or she will endeavor to act in the best i...
There's also the danger that allowing Federal employees to advocate for political campaigns while on duty would undermin...
her contemptuous defiance of your board and you, as the director of it, is unacceptable and intolerable.
Rather than undermine these rights for public and private sector workers alike, this Committee should focus on issues wh...
If a false statement has been made at the hearing about a fellow Member of Congress, can it be corrected?
