These are important issues. I don't pretend to know the answers.
Why is the administration contemplating changes to well-established nuclear doctrine and targeting requirements?
In my view, our current alert posture is not destabilizing.
the United States needs a spectrum of nuclear and non-nuclear force employment options and flexibility in planning
Any further reductions should be subject to extensive and serious consultation with our allies.
the President's goal is permeating DOD.
the President should provide guidance which all previous Presidents have done without the benefit of that analysis.
for the first time
The New START treaty represents a commitment by the world's two largest powers to the goal of disarmament.
Dr. Miller and General Kehler, why did Mr. Donilon suggest a need to re-review our alert posture?
One of the problems we have is that as we draw down our weapons, it seems to me that China may have an incentive to seek...
The perverse consequence of too much reduction could actually be a proliferation of nuclear weapons in other countries t...
I think the National Security Advisor's comments were troubling. I don't think they can be blithely set aside.
I got the great concern that ours should be drawn down; and that these nations are really worried that we might reach an...
But, I'd like to hear your thoughts on the underlying issue here, that private U.S. business cannot freely open new faci...
I want to turn to another area. On April 20 of this year, the acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Boa...
Without flood control nothing else matters.
It helps you compete, does it not?
