the United States needs a spectrum of nuclear and non-nuclear force employment options and flexibility in planning
Any further reductions should be subject to extensive and serious consultation with our allies.
the President's goal is permeating DOD.
the President should provide guidance which all previous Presidents have done without the benefit of that analysis.
for the first time
The New START treaty represents a commitment by the world's two largest powers to the goal of disarmament.
Dr. Miller and General Kehler, why did Mr. Donilon suggest a need to re-review our alert posture?
One of the problems we have is that as we draw down our weapons, it seems to me that China may have an incentive to seek equivalence with th...
The perverse consequence of too much reduction could actually be a proliferation of nuclear weapons in other countries that previously did n...
I think the National Security Advisor's comments were troubling. I don't think they can be blithely set aside.
I got the great concern that ours should be drawn down; and that these nations are really worried that we might reach an agreement that woul...
Any decisions about nuclear weapons and NATO would not be undertaken unilaterally by the United States, but any decisions would be taken at ...
In your best military judgment, how prudent is it to begin consideration of reductions past the New START levels?
Current guidance is not 'wrong.'
Dr. Miller and General Kehler, what will be the impact of these changes on our ability to hedge against future threats and uncertainties?
The 2010 NPR examined possible adjustments to the current alert posture of U.S. strategic forces and concluded that the current posture shou...
The purpose of the NPR follow-on analysis is to ensure that our forces remain properly configured for the real threats of today and tomorrow...
I am concerned this administration intends to ignore the importance of achieving strategic balance and establishing a defensive posture that...
