As I look at these negotiations, those two pieces are missing, and they are very important.
I disagreed with the administration lifting the missile resolutions whatsoever in the 8 years.
I think that Congress should pass an AUMF that would be a follow-on should Iran decide not to comply with the agreement.
I think in most of the testimony that I have heard with respect to the agreement over the last couple of weeks, people h...
the likelihood is incrementalism, we cannot rule out a decision by the Supreme Leader to throw out the inspectors and to...
I think the agreement will spur the arms race.
I would prefer that there not be an arms race in the Middle East, although obviously it is quite useful for the American...
The idea that we are going to try to create a Syrian opposition where the members have no ties of any kind to any Islami...
I think the Iranians are going to have access to a lot more cash, which they are going to use to refurbish a badly dilap...
I think all of this is important in creating the kind of intimidation of the Iranians that we should want to have in our...
I guess, based on some of the testimony that we have heard, I have assumed that we ought to be thinking about not just o...
It is my understanding...that if Iran violates the deal, those sanctions would come back into place.
So those sanctions will remain in place?
I think my understanding is that we are talking about nuclear sanctions, with respect to the agreement.
I am deeply skeptical that we will ever reimpose sanctions on terrorism grounds that have that kind of significant econo...
I also want to point out for the record that everybody on this committee voted for the Iran Nuclear Review Act of 2015. ...
I do not think it is to the benefit of this committee, this Congress, or the American people for any of us to impugn the...
But if I could just ask one final question.
