
Our aquifers are disappearing, too. USGS is helping us.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
16,000+·quotes on file

Our aquifers are disappearing, too. USGS is helping us.

I just wanted folks on the other side of the aisle to know my question did have a $250 million attachment to it of money that, in my opinion, would be wasted.

How do you expect to maintain the scientific or the technical recommendations from independent peer-reviewed scientists, that have been used for decades, by Republicans and Democrats across the board, both Presidents and people in Congress.

I have lost all confidence in the way that you handled some of the questions and the way that you said you took responsibility but then, in fact, deflected the responsibility.

So what are you going to do to regain not only the trust of your staff, but you have lost my trust?

I have a hard time believing--and it came with her opening statement where twice she used the words solid science.

In making these investments, which was the right thing to do structurally for the building, but also it enhances our national treasure.

I have been known to wear gloves, sitting at my desk.

Members often return money from their accounts. It goes back into the U.S. Treasury.

I am from Minnesota, so when I tell you it is cold, it is cold.

And I just want to again commend all the workmanship, all the work that you did outside of the United States Capitol.

I really appreciate it. But what prompted this change?

We are not looking to purchase anything new.

And I think what we would save in the long run would be saving taxpayers money in the long run by doing this and getting through the list.