When you get rid of the consumer protections in the Affordable Care Act, you're turning the clock back.
The Trump administration seems dead-set on making the care they need unaffordable and inaccessible.
The budget embraces the old Graham-Cassidy proposal.
We know something about pre-existing conditions, and this does not protect people with pre-existing conditions.
That is not right; those people mean well, but they are not right.
you cannot solve this problem if you let the manufacturers off the hook.
So this idea that we are going to just sit in our offices back here and wait for somebody to tell us, oh, we are going t...
This has very, very substantial implications.
But there is a Federal law, something I fought very hard for.
We are going to greenlight policies that are appropriately called junk because they are not worth the paper they are wri...
I have been very interested in waivers--a lot of Senators have--but this is not a waiver.
This is going to be a question of whether the Department is going to say Federal law... controls.
We wrote a bipartisan law--Senator Dole, for example, was very helpful in it--which drained the swamp, an appropriate ph...
What junk insurance is all about is making sure that insurance companies can charge more for people with pre-existing co...
I share Chairman Hatch's view about the opioid epidemic.
The Trump prescription drug plan lets pharmaceutical companies keep on--to borrow a phrase--getting away with murder.
The agenda of health-care discrimination is out in force in this Trump budget.
In a lot of ways, junk insurance just turns back the clock.
