Currently, Wisconsin and 25 other States are seeking a stay of this illegal rule.
Costs will increase for our customers.
We all want a clean environment, something we all value, particularly here in the State of Wisconsin.
We have come a long way. And again, it is a goal, maintaining a clean environment, cleaning up even further, that we all...
I would find it hard to believe... that regulators and EPA could better manage our State's pristine water resources than...
I would like to point out before we go into questions that we did invite the EPA administrator, Gina McCarthy, to appear...
What is the benefit of those reductions in pollution versus what is the cost to society?
The Federal Government is ramping up its jurisdiction over the States.
But this EPA regulation is actually weaker than the one that was in effect up until 2001.
But it would have been nice to have them here, and we could have bounced some of these ideas off them.
One study on the draft rule projected the job loss to our State at 21,000 jobs for 2030 with a $1.82 billion drop in dis...
But do you understand businesses and organizations are concerned that sometimes the Federal Government, even though they...
this really is an attempt for a dramatic increase in jurisdiction by the Federal Government over waters within States.
I had written an oversight letter to Mr. Howard Shelanski, the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory...
Maybe, that is a pretty good argument.
In the first two years of Obama Administration where they had a 60-vote filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
$37,000 per day could be the potential fines if you do not obtain the necessary permit.
The impact of the rules on our economy--it is not being exaggerated--it will be detrimental and it will be irreversible.
