Reform of the acquisition system is necessary to maintain America's technological and military dominance.
When our troops deploy to war, we have a responsibility to provide them the very best equipment.
the concept of 'acquisitions reform' has been around for many decades, however we have witnessed major weapons programs taking a longer time...
another sequester would prevent any opportunity to recover the readiness our Nation deserves and lead to creating a hollow force we have fou...
what is the current status of our retrograde and reset efforts from Iraq and Afghanistan, and what equipment shortfalls would we face if we ...
what is the Marine Corps' plan to restore these units to readiness?
Training simulation accounts were severely cut due to sequestration, yet they can provide significant cost savings.
the sequestration effect is even greater because they cannot necessarily reallocate in a way because they are a small supplier.
What is the impact of the shortfall?
Providing the best weapons and equipment to our service members can be the difference between our troops returning home safely or not at all...
I guess I do not understand why we are negotiating for them when we are dealing with scarce dollars and we could be better focusing our reso...
If sequester does happen, how many years would full readiness recovery be delayed?
I think one of our goals in this acquisition reform is actually to streamline and to actually make this a more efficient yet accountable sys...
I am just trying to understand why that is necessary.
The Army today is able to produce only enough readiness to meet requirements--and we can only achieve this because of the extra funding made...
What it should not do is strip away the Service Chief's authority when he says I need this capability.
I heard from each of you that we do not need more layers. What we need to do is eliminate some of the layers.
What is the Marine Corps' requirement for amphibious warships?
