Whenever and however the Senate addresses financial regulatory reform and consumer protection in the coming weeks and mo...
Might it be that, if we provided the FTC with more resources, this 7-year average proceedings could be shortened?
We want to ensure the FTC has the capabilities and resources necessary to keep our consumers safe.
I would argue that it's really Congress's role to decide when FTC needs that authority, delegate it appropriately, and t...
Magnuson-Moss did not kill FTC rulemaking. A change in enforcement philosophy killed FTC rulemaking.
Been used one time.
I would support a prevalence requirement that meant something.
You have no objection to the Congress working on tightening that definition up and being more helpful.
We can bring much-needed transparency to financial services by fully preserving the FTC's enormously important role in p...
Consumer advocates believe we need to liberate the FTC from statutory limitations that have shackled the Commission from...
I know Senator Pryor's prior record in enforcement, and he would've done the rules a lot faster.
Thank you. Continuing with Chairman Muris, Commissioner Rosch said there were no Magnuson-Moss rules since 1978. Is that...
You have the record--the letter in the record, but let me note some of those signatories here in order to exemplify the ...
If we move forward and repeal, or substantially change, the Magnuson-Moss safeguards, what's it going to hurt?
Absolutely, Senator. And I'm a Republican, I should add. But, that was my view then, and it is my view now.
It's important to note that these are representatives of the very businesses we are relying on to create new jobs and pu...
I think that would be useful, Senator.
If we need additional funding or some priority readjustments, we hope you'll communicate that with us in the appropriate...
