So a power plant owner looking at this proposed rule could expect that the improvements in emissions that they would be obliged to make as a...
So a vulnerable person who goes out on a bad air day and experiences no apparent, immediate ill effects, doesn't feel shortness of breath, d...
And so the American Thoracic Society, in your view, is also reputable and reliable when it makes a recommendation like this on a matter with...
Somebody obviously didn't find the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to be very credible, in ignoring their recommendations back in 20...
You have made a perfect segue to Dr. Ferkol.
What is the track record of your estimates?
As a dad, I will be the first one to admit that when a young child is in an emergency room with an asthma attack, it is likely to be the mom...
The revised standard is a significant improvement.
So the risk is not that the child or the vulnerable person is going to suddenly begin coughing or having shortness of breath or have an asth...
So some things, some compliance regimes that will help States achieve the standard are already in place.
So a private citizen listening to this hearing can take comfort that the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee is a reputable and reliable...
I do want to, with unanimous consent of all present, put into the record a combination press release and letter issued by the ranking member...
And does the harm tend to be cumulative?
Hair salons are not extinct. Glad to hear it.
the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, in its recommendations to the Administrator in June, was so clear about its findings.
EPA's analysis that the benefits are between $6 billion and $13 billion and the costs around $4 billion, that analysis is not a first effort...
the existing standard, the previous standard, the 75 parts per billion standard, was criticized at the time that it was adopted by the Clean...
I think what is irresponsible is for us to continue to spend unlimited amounts of money on an effort without some clear expectation of what ...
