And when you retrace it, you will find that there were three kind of things on their mind: One was a President who tries...
In other words, we had unanimous agreement among our academic scholars that abuse of power is an impeachable offense.
The committee did not subpoena the call detail records for any Member of Congress or staff.
this weekend, Tom Ridge, the former Republican governor of my home State, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the first Homela...
I move the committee grant House Resolution 755, impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high ...
I did want to ask unanimous consent, and I am not sure which letter Mr. Perlmutter introduced before, but we do have a l...
the only radical view I am embracing here is the idea that we the people should be governed by a constitution that divid...
And over 700 historians who have signed a separate letter.
Yes. Look, there's one -- one of the two article really does bothers me on the weaponization font and that is that the s...
you heard Chuck Schumer, you know, we want witnesses. But, you know, only witnesses that we think are relevant.
the public is squarely in two camps and vote -- and they're squarely in two camps here.
The President did not have corrupt intent.
The facts simply do not align with the Democrats' claim of obstruction.
Too many of our dogs currently suffer from inhumane conditions in commercial breeding facilities.
Abuse of power is, at this point, just a vestige of quid pro quo.
Democrats just know they can't beat President Trump in 2020; they can't beat the President on his merits.
Trump does not state a quid pro quo in the call.
The President didn't have corrupt intent, and that is why the Democrats cannot make out a prima facie case.
