It appears, Mr. Secretary, that there is no empirical evidence that the existing policy hurt employment.
You are extending the program without any knowledge of its effectiveness.
Not on our watch, Mr. Secretary.
your budget proposes cutting the Bureau of International Labor Laws by 79 percent.
the Department proposed to revise and repeal protections for 16- and 17-year-old workers.
Twenty is not a sample size.
Will you withdraw this proposal?
It is a pat on the back with no deterrence impacts on the employer or others who are violating the law.
You have concluded on what basis that scarce resources, key labor standards agencies, are better spent on a program that...
Your mission is the heart and soul of what this country is about is in terms of fostering work and giving people the opp...
We do have the obligation to look at employment and training, and look at the best way to provide them with the potentia...
your proposed rule which would strip protections away from more than 3 million workers is almost exactly what the Chambe...
We lock in the prices at the current rate, and they are thousands and thousands of dollars.
Your testimony is silent about the Administration's plan to link Medicare Part B payments to prices paid in other wealth...
the short-term plans, also known as junk plans, that the President Fiscal Year 2020 budget touts does not include matern...
I believe it is our responsibility, and a moral responsibility, for us to fund at the Federal level gun violence researc...
He values continuing tax breaks for the rich while imposing devastating cuts to needy children, families on Medicaid and...
No one is saying don't feed your children. Come on.
