Not on the North Slope, though. We will be very curious about your numbers on the North Slope.
I think it is important to go back and look at the statute. We are the co-regulator. We are the co-sovereign here.
Why is this a requirement? Why is the compensatory land that you are seeking----
I think it is an area that, in terms of Congressional oversight, that is important.
How about how important it is to the people of the area?
Pretty tough words are used when we hear whether it is from Wainwright or Nuiqsut or Craig or the folks at Great Northwe...
You don't have $1.4 million and you should not be required to give up land to develop lands.
If our Alaska Native Corporations, regional corporations, village corporations want to develop the land that they were g...
It seems to me it is squarely undermining the intent of ANCSA.
Two years in a row the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that you have not abided by the statute or the Constitution.
the problem is when Washington, DC dictates certain policies with, kind of, a one-size-fits-all mentality
These statistics are why this is such an important issue for us.
I think we have gotten a lot of good ideas from this panel.
We have reached a point where Federal agencies are unreasonably binding the hands of well-intentioned, environmentally-p...
It seems to me that that is completely at odds with both the goals of both of those statutes.
Almost $3.4 million in 2014 we had to pay to the Federal Government for mitigation to build roads in Alaska.
I commend you for your company's willingness to actually challenge this because that takes a lot of guts, a lot of money...
It seems like Federal agencies come in with all kinds of different requirements, completely uncoordinated.
