I do know a lot about it.
I need an answer to the question, why did the Department do this and what happened to the money?
This rule is about benefitting big corporations and not working people.
They thought they were coming in to legitimate jobs and they ended up in massage parlors, and they were exploited, put i...
It appears, Mr. Secretary, that there is no empirical evidence that the existing policy hurt employment.
You are extending the program without any knowledge of its effectiveness.
Not on our watch, Mr. Secretary.
your budget proposes cutting the Bureau of International Labor Laws by 79 percent.
the Department proposed to revise and repeal protections for 16- and 17-year-old workers.
Twenty is not a sample size.
Will you withdraw this proposal?
It is a pat on the back with no deterrence impacts on the employer or others who are violating the law.
You have concluded on what basis that scarce resources, key labor standards agencies, are better spent on a program that...
Your mission is the heart and soul of what this country is about is in terms of fostering work and giving people the opp...
That is not the road that we need to go down. That is not what this Agency is about.
We do have the obligation to look at employment and training, and look at the best way to provide them with the potentia...
We want Federal law to pre-empt it.
It hurts middle-class families. It hurts working families. It hurts low-income families.
