I think we could identify a couple of sites in Colorado that would provide a good opportunity to demonstrate a pilot pro...
The subcommittee will come to order.
I think the ratio of getting $1 to $2 billion in construction for a $100 billion program is ridiculous.
These projects aren't luxuries. These projects, in many cases, mean life or death.
the timeline for our water resource projects are completely unacceptable.
If we were to charge fees under the auspices of using it for a particular purpose and then spending it elsewhere in the ...
Welcome everyone to the hearing today: 'Building a 21st-Century Infrastructure for America: Water Resources Projects and...
I ask unanimous consent that Members not on the subcommittee be permitted to sit with the subcommittee at today's hearin...
There should be no change in the 340B?
I think I did ten studies: NYU, Harvard, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, the University of Chicago, OIG, GAO, and each of thes...
Your good work is presented as typical of all 340B's. Clinics, safety net hospitals, this is the face of 340B, when ther...
We need to think as Senator Smith did, what does it mean to a patient paying $16,000 a year?
If you focus upon the patient, this is driving up the cost.
It supports the criticism that the 340B Program is converted from one that serves vulnerable patient populations to one ...
Absolutely not.
What we typically term as a legacy site or an abandoned site in Colorado is that mining took place prior to environmenta...
Absolutely, I would agree with that. I think it is critical to provide states with that type of liability protection to ...
We in Louisiana have recognized that you cannot be pro-environmental unless you are pro-business and you cannot be pro-b...
