It is an insurance policy, absolutely. It is a source of leverage and stability for us from a geopolitical perspective, ...
It seems like everybody is wrong with the exception of you in this case, and the EPA.
This is about oversight.
But your own chief counsel thinks that this is likely not going to pass constitutional muster.
So you have the authority as a political appointee to look at your folks not on a judgment call, but just say, hey, gene...
I think we in the Congress need to do a lot more in terms of oversight on this process.
Arbitrary limits within the definition of neighboring are not rooted in science.
Oversight is particularly important when we have a pattern of behavior from certain agencies, like EPA, of consistently ...
This is incredibly, incredibly damming. The Justice Department can't rely on this agency deference when the agency itsel...
Congress has the constitutional authority, and indeed obligation, to conduct oversight of the actions of executive branc...
The Corps was not part of any analysis to reach the conclusions described. Therefore, it is inaccurate to reflect that t...
the Administrator of the EPA essentially said, hey, whether we win or lose in the Supreme Court, it doesn't really matte...
We all want clean water. My State has the cleanest water probably anyplace in the world, and, to be perfectly frank, it ...
This arrogance and disregard for the law are evident in the WOTUS rule as well.
Anything you can do to provide more opportunity for the States to play a bigger role in this I would be for.
If you find a species that is threatened or endangered, that should be good news.
This is an important bipartisan reform: good for species, good for the economy, and good for the country.
I am in agreement with you on the issue of State involvement.
