It has to be technologically, economically feasible. It has to have a cost benefit analysis.
If we find that perchlorate is a danger, and we have proved it to the water districts and we have proved it to everyone,...
Because greenhouses gases fit well within the Clean Air Act's definition of air pollutant, we hold that EPA has the stat...
We are going to absolutely look at the science of carbon pollution and its impact on our people, on our planet.
But I do have to correct the record, because you quoted me as saying it is appropriate to ask about carbon pollution. Wh...
There were huge lawsuits. They settled the matter for hundreds of millions of dollars.
The EPA had the responsibility to make an endangerment finding. That was under the law.
I just have to say, you make me very proud, as Senator from California.
We are a country of laws, not people, no matter how strongly we feel.
So we are looking at a major problem here.
I think the group should welcome it, and I think there are some that do.
It is our responsibility to protect the health and safety of our people, all of us. This is our job.
I can tell you that the worst thing we can do for our economy and for everything else is to ignore these issues.
I think that the arguments you raised are absolutely appropriate. But I honestly think we have answers to them.
I also find it disturbing that not one emerging contaminant has been regulated since 1996.
I believe that in the 1996 law, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the rewrite of the Water Act, what Congress wanted to happe...
Well, let's just set aside for a minute any kind of prejudices on who should act.
They want the water safe.
