H.R. 1 is a prime example of the Democratic Party telling States that the Federal Government knows better than they do.
Democrats boast that H.R. 1 is for the people. Yet they are failing the people by not doing their due diligence to ensur...
What H.R. 1 will do would codify that we will have more registered voters in so many more census tracks.
H.R. 1 forces a nationwide approach that will be costly and ineffective.
That is not what the American people want, and we still--I mean, this is the reason why we have got to slow down.
They want to send a political message. They don't want to govern.
That is why we need to have more hearings. That is why we need to have a better process.
You are basically saying, okay, any Presidential candidate does not have to make the choice anymore to choose to abide b...
Now I am understanding why, when we tried to abolish the Presidential Election Campaign Fund to put $370 million-plus in...
clearly answers the call for a new Voting Rights Act using the template from States like Michigan, Florida, and Missouri
This is a great debate. America's election system, as I think everybody in this room can attest, can always be improved.
I would love to talk to you about redistricting reform. I am from Illinois. We would love to have your support for redis...
They felt it was outmoded.
Bipartisan election reforms can happen, but not with Republicans not even being consulted.
H.R. 1 creates a false sense of security by federalizing and centralizing our election system.
The issue here is trying to provide candidates with a way to run for office where they don't have to depend on lobbyists...
I cannot support H.R. 1 in its current form because of those.
We don't want H.R. 1 taking power away from the States given to them by the Constitution.
