What is our end game? The end game would be--we've been there, bogged down for quite some time.
Is it obvious that--basically, that Russia and Iran will have more influence on who the next leader or the leadership of...
Senators Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) introduced the Senate companion (S. 2765) to the bill.
It's so hard to go home and explain our involvement unless we're going to have a no-fly and protect those who want to be...
If I can just ask: Is the rebels or the coalition forces, which we are supporting in Syria--are they more intent on figh...
But, we don't see that.
How damaging to our allies would we have been--would the U.S. have been if it had been defeated?
That's the caution that we have with Assad right now.
What happens at the end of 8 and a half to 10 years? What happens at 15?
More so than Assad.
Have we been able to assist more of the leaders, more of the well-educated, more of the peace-loving?
the Iran nuclear decision was probably the most difficult for all of us, not just in this committee, but, I think, in th...
I believe that the agency is guilty of malpractice.
The United States and Russia has two complete different objectives.
Congress must direct and mandate results and outcomes.
You can only look back at our past performance and find out, you know, and learn from that.
You do agree that Russia's primary is to protect Assad.
I always said, if I couldn't go home and explain it, I couldn't vote for it.
